« Kerry's Doctor Speaks | Main | Disney Blocks Moore »
May 04, 2004
A Small Conundrum
The National Academy of Sciences estimates that around 600,000 metric tons of oil per year seeps into the ocean naturally, with estimates ranging from 200,000 to 2,000,000 metric tons per year. Plugging the 600,000 estimate through some conversions and that comes to 4.4 million barrels a year. World oil reserves are thought by some to have amounted to about 2 trillion barrels, with about 900 billion barrels already consumed from 1860 to present. This and this brings up some interesting questions.
They're telling us we're about to run out, using roughly 44 billion barrels a year, with enough maybe for a few more decades, possibly a century. Either way, we're only pumping oil at 3,000 to 30,000 times the rate that it was naturally leaking anyway, and that's only including oceanic leaking that we know about. There's no reason to believe this leak rate was any less in the distant past, and indeed it was likely higher since there would've been more to leak, in theory, and we had continual periods of continental collision, drift, and major upheavals to keep putting cracks in the bedrock.
This brings me to a conundrum. At 4.4 million barrels per year of natural seepage, the 2 trillion barrels of reserves would've leaked out in just 454,000 years. Yet they say the oil has been down there for 600 million years. By my numbers any such oil would've leaked out by around 599.55 million years ago. Somebody's theory or numbers has to be way off base, no? You can fudge the numbers quite a bit, but this one needs a correction factor of over a thousand fold. So isn't that interesting?
May 4, 2004 in Science | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453d3fb69e200d83456c35369e2
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Small Conundrum:
» How much oil is there? from billgraziano.com
[Read More]
Tracked on May 8, 2004 1:00:38 PM
Comments
Velly intellestink, indeed! ;)
Posted by: B.C., Imperial Torturerâ„¢ at May 4, 2004 11:26:04 PM
I think the latest theory is that it is not derived from organic material at all - but is sourced from deeper in the earth. Read something on that recently but can't remeber where.
Posted by: Daniel at May 5, 2004 6:55:28 AM
I believe the theory is that oil comes from organic materials (like those found naturally in space) trapped in the Earth when it coalesced billions of years ago. I've also heard the theory that deep crust anaerobic bacteria may be responsible for oil.
Bolie IV
Posted by: Bolie Williams IV at May 5, 2004 10:24:09 AM
That's the deep-earth petroleum theory, which the Russians have worked on since 1951. It seems to be slowly gaining acceptance, and if true there's a whole lot more oil than we thought, since it's primarily the Russians who have bothered drilling deep in places where no fossils would be found (ie non-sedimentary strata and layers that predate most life). They're pumping oil out of there, too.
Posted by: George Turner at May 5, 2004 1:43:21 PM
Yeah, the key to a clearer future will likely not be 'alternative fuels,' but cleaner burning engines.
Posted by: Scott at May 5, 2004 3:01:07 PM
You know, this month's Scientific American just had an article showing that using hydrogen as a fuel doesn't really do much to cut pollution, if you take into account the pollution created in making the hydrogen in the first place.
I saw the first enivornmentalist denunciations of the hydrogen economy just after Bush backed the idea, so maybe we can get rid of some of the environmentalist's wackier ideas by just having Bush throw his weight behind them. Then they'll start screaming about the evils of the plans they'd previously been advocating, and we can all get back to other business.
Posted by: George Turner at May 5, 2004 4:38:01 PM





