« Warship Power Systems | Main | Seymour Hersh Follows Fellow Lemmings »
May 18, 2004
A Counter Argument
I'm sure you've all seen the quotes from babbling Blix and assorted other ass biscuits about how the sarin chemical gas shell that was used as an IED must've been some kind of bizarre fluke. Here's another way to look at it. Iraq is apparently the only country where WMDs are so common that our soldiers can get attacked with wildly illegal nerve gas completely by accident. Isn't that amazing? I must go think on that for a while. I suggest you do the same. It might prove useful.
May 18, 2004 in War | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83453d3fb69e200d8342aa02853ef
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Counter Argument:
Comments
Well, maybe not... S-Blixut wants us to believe it was NOT Sarin, but I'd have to blow my brains out, either figuratively or really, in order to place faith in such tripe!
No, thanks, I'd rather not 'dwell on the unpleasant things of life.'
Posted by: Sharps Shooter at May 18, 2004 5:16:18 AM
Yes, indeed. Scary thought. here's another one
Posted by: the markman at May 18, 2004 12:09:28 PM
Well that didn't work. Try this:
http://emersonsview.blogspot.com
Posted by: the markman at May 18, 2004 12:10:23 PM
All the media attention demonstrates to the terrorists how big of a story a real chemical attack on our troops would be.
Posted by: Jane at May 18, 2004 1:28:09 PM
My guess now is the chemical shells were simply disguised as ordinary shells and we very well may already have passed them over. Apparently this shell didn't have the normal markings chemical weapons have.
We know they had WMD. The question has been WTF are they? They didn't disappear into thin air and contrary to the moonbats at DU Rumsfeld didn't sneak a howitzer shell in the country last week in his shaving kit.
I had been thinking they were in Syria. Now I think they may still be in Iraq and may have been there all along.
Posted by: Calliope at May 18, 2004 1:59:20 PM
Good post.
James
Posted by: James R. Rummel at May 18, 2004 5:59:54 PM
